[isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
- From: "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:18:48 -0400
Dlink.....Dlink....Dlink.....
Or buy professional equipment.....:)
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:29 AM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
NetGear is the one brand that I've never been able to get to work. We've
always chosen Linksys for the micro branch offices. Which NetGear model
works for you? When I tried them we got wireless or VPN client access
out of them but not both at the same time. NetGear said it was a known
issue and they didn't have solution at the time.
Amy Babinchak
Harbor Computer Services
248-546-6056 Office
248-890-1794 Mobile
ISA: http://isainsbs.blogspot.com
for Clients: http://smalltechnotes.blogspot.com
Website: http://www.harborcomputerservices.net
-----Original Message-----
From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of John T (Lists)
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 1:19 AM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
I choose Netgear. Seriously.
John T
eServices For You
"Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood."
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf
> Of Amy Babinchak
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:07 PM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
>
> DLink? Seriously?
>
> Amy Babinchak
>
> Harbor Computer Services
> (248) 546-6056 office
> (248) 890-1794 mobile
>
> http://isainsbs.blogspot.com
> http://www.harborcomputerservices.net
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf
> Of Steve Moffat
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:14 PM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys?
>
> Lose the Linksys, get a Dlink....:P
>
> They work.
>
> S
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:54 PM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Anyone Speak Linksys?
>
> I've got this in my VPN log on the Linksys end of a ISA 2004 to
Linksys
> site-to-site VPN connection. The tunnel claims to be connected but I'm
> having trouble sending data through it. Here's the log on the Linksys
> side.
>
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log received Delete SA payload:
deleting
> ISAKMP State #127
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type =
> [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type =
> [FRAGMENTATION]
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type =
> [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> Responder Received Main Mode 1st packet
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> Responder Send Main Mode 2nd packet
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Initiating Main Mode
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type =
> [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004]
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type =
> [FRAGMENTATION]
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type =
> [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an
> unknown exchange
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR:
> '72.158.241.2'
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main
Mode
> Phase 1 SA Established
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info]
Initiator
> Cookies = 8829 f0cf 9dc2 73e1
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info]
Responder
> Cookies = 5bc7 46b1 dc42 b7d4
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log initiating Quick Mode
PSK+TUNNEL+PFS
>
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log IKE message has the Commit Flag
set
> but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<<
> Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound
> SPI value = 617c35a1
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound
> SPI value = 9faea60d
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>>
> Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick
Mode
> Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an
> unknown exchange
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log IKE message has the Commit Flag
set
> but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag
> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log message ignored because it
contains
> an payload type (ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH) unexpected in this message
> Dec 14 18:37:41 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an
> unknown exchange
>
>
>
>
> Amy Babinchak
>
>
Other related posts:
