This is one of my strawberry patch networks. Company deices airplanes at airports all over the country. Main office is in Florida. The airport offices only contain 1 pc and a time clock with an IP address. Hardly seems worth the price of a Cisco router when all that's connected to it are 2 devices. I might try using the Netopia directly have the local guy disconnect the Linksys all together. Amy Babinchak Harbor Computer Services -----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God) Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 12:21 PM To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys? For "real" routers, like at the border for multiple T1 facilities, etc, I've still not found anything that performs like or is reliable as a good old Cisco router. I've had 2611's and MC3810's in service 24/7 literally for YEARS with no incident at all. At my house in Tahoe, my MC3810 ran nonstop for 5 years straight in my *garage*. We're talking weather extremes from 100F with severe dust to sub-zero freezing / high moisture environments without any issues at all. Those boxes are just indestructible. As far as these "throw-away" boxes, I too use NetGear. My FVX538 has done quite well considering, and has only "locked up" on my once. t On 12/14/06 10:18 PM, "John T (Lists)" <johnlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all: > I choose Netgear. Seriously. > > John T > eServices For You > > "Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood." > Ralph Waldo Emerson (1802-1882) > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf >> Of Amy Babinchak >> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:07 PM >> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys? >> >> DLink? Seriously? >> >> Amy Babinchak >> >> Harbor Computer Services >> (248) 546-6056 office >> (248) 890-1794 mobile >> >> http://isainsbs.blogspot.com >> http://www.harborcomputerservices.net >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf >> Of Steve Moffat >> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:14 PM >> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isapros] Re: Anyone Speak Linksys? >> >> Lose the Linksys, get a Dlink....:P >> >> They work. >> >> S >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak >> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 8:54 PM >> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isapros] Anyone Speak Linksys? >> >> I've got this in my VPN log on the Linksys end of a ISA 2004 to Linksys >> site-to-site VPN connection. The tunnel claims to be connected but I'm >> having trouble sending data through it. Here's the log on the Linksys >> side. >> >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log received Delete SA payload: deleting >> ISAKMP State #127 >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type = >> [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004] >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type = >> [FRAGMENTATION] >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type = >> [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< >> Responder Received Main Mode 1st packet >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> >> Responder Send Main Mode 2nd packet >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Initiating Main Mode >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> >> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type = >> [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000004] >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type = >> [FRAGMENTATION] >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type = >> [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< >> Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> >> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet >> Dec 14 18:37:38 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an >> unknown exchange >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< >> Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> >> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> >> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: >> '72.158.241.2' >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main Mode >> Phase 1 SA Established >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Initiator >> Cookies = 8829 f0cf 9dc2 73e1 >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Responder >> Cookies = 5bc7 46b1 dc42 b7d4 >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log initiating Quick Mode PSK+TUNNEL+PFS >> >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> >> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log IKE message has the Commit Flag set >> but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< >> Initiator Received Quick Mode 2nd packet >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Inbound >> SPI value = 617c35a1 >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Outbound >> SPI value = 9faea60d >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> >> Initiator Send Quick Mode 3rd packet >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick Mode >> Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel Connected >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an >> unknown exchange >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log IKE message has the Commit Flag set >> but Pluto doesn't implement this feature; ignoring flag >> Dec 14 18:37:39 2006 VPN Log message ignored because it contains >> an payload type (ISAKMP_NEXT_HASH) unexpected in this message >> Dec 14 18:37:41 2006 VPN Log Phase 1 message is part of an >> unknown exchange >> >> >> >> >> Amy Babinchak >> >> > > > > >