RE: strange differences between networks......
- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 06:47:52 -0800
That's a name resolution issue.
What is the domain suffix for each remote site?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted D [mailto:tdoholis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 6:51 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] strange differences between networks......
http://www.ISAserver.org
I have ISA 2004 with many networks behind it. Everything seems to be set
up correctly as web proxy clients all work correctly however there seem
to be 2 confusing items left:
1. remote secure nat clients do not work. The routing layout works as
remote clients below:
remote site GW - 10.20.3.9
|
remote router (10.20.3.9)(10.20.7.2)
|
Local router (10.20.7.3)(10.20.1.9)
|default route to ISA
|
ISA (10.20.1.41 inside)(no gw)
Windows route to 10.20.3.x via
10.20.1.9
2. clients from 1 remote site can access an internal webserver via a
dotless name but clients from another remote site must use a FQDN?
any ideas?
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading
Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org Windows
Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security
Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
Other related posts:
