RE: direct access?
- From: "Ara" <ara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:11:07 -0700
Hell Tom,
I have created a separate http rule with no filter enabled for it, based
on
us.i1.yimg.com and us.a1.yimg.com and a56.g.akamai.net, so I got delta
and yahoo working. But this way I have to monitor logs for every single
site to see where images come from.
My question is might be better that if I use url set instead and add
http://*.yahoo.com and http://yahoo.com/* but this was as described on
software only support http traffic not https.
Do you have any suggestion for making this easier
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:31 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: direct access?
http://www.ISAserver.org
Hi Ara,
Can you give me a URL that isn't working? And a log file entry showing
the blocked response?
Thanks!
Tom
www.isaserver.org/shinder
Tom and Deb Shinder's Configuring ISA Server 2004
http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
-----Original Message-----
From: Ara [mailto:ara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:28 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: direct access?
http://www.ISAserver.org
Tom,
I did that and still same problem. This is going crazy
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:25 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: direct access?
Attention:
This message, including any attachment(s), is intended only for the use of the
individual(s) to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged or confidential. Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or have received
this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and
permanently delete this message including any attachment(s), without reading it
or making a copy.
Any outgoing message has been scanned for possible harmful file(s) or
script(s), but it is your sole responsibility to run detection tools as we
won't guarantee the safety of message(s).
Other related posts:
