Hi Stefaan, I don't understand the problem. What's the difference if they start on 500 or 4500? Tom Thomas W Shinder, M.D. Site: www.isaserver.org Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/drisa/ Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 MVP -- ISA Firewalls **Who is John Galt?** > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefaan Pouseele [mailto:stefaan.pouseele@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:54 AM > To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] > Subject: [isalist] Windows XP SP2: start L2TP/IPSec IKE > negotiation on UDP port 4500 instead of 500 > > http://www.ISAserver.org > > Hey guys, > > Is it possible to configure Windows XP SP2 to start the IKE > negotiation of a > L2TP/IPSec VPN connection directly on UDP port 4500 instead > of UDP port 500? > According to the RFC's this is a valid configuration. > > The reason for this question is that a lot of cheap sharing > devices limit > the number of IPSec connections to one because of their IPSec hack > implemention (aka IPSec passthough). If we switch off the > IPSec passthrough > setting in the sharing device then UDP port 500 is completely > blocked. > > Thanks, > Stefaan > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist > ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp > ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ > ------------------------------------------------------ > Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites: > http://www.techgenix.com > ------------------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion > List as: tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe visit > http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist > Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >