RE: VPN and DHCP
- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:53:55 -0800
It's a stupid recommendation.
If your DHCP server is so taxed by the current usage that you need to
deploy one just for VPN clients, you need to retire the VIC-20 that is
your DHCP server or deploy another one using the 60-40 rule anyway.
DHCP, like WINS or DNS is a ridiculously lightweight application and
protocol.
-------------------------------------------------------
Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/
http://isatools.org
Read the help / books / articles!
-------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew English [mailto:andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 16:49
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] VPN and DHCP
http://www.ISAserver.org
A friend of mine highly recommended that I not tax my internal DHCP
server for doing my VPN via ISA 2004, and that I instead install DHCP
server on ISA 2004 giving VPN users a different IP range.
I am looked at different tutorials, even Tom's book but am not quite
sure how to tackle it.
Andrew
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
Other related posts:
