RE: Thoughts about TSAC publish via ISA

  • From: "John Tolmachoff" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'[ Discussion List]'" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 12:50:26 -0700

I second that thought on TSAC is not as secure as the regular client. Plus,
with the regular client you can change the ports.


John Tolmachoff 

IT Manager, Network Engineer

211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106

Fullerton, CA  92835

714-578-7999, ext. 104

jtolmachoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <> 



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Moffat [mailto:steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:42 PM
To: [ Discussion List]
Subject: Thoughts about TSAC publish via ISA


Please feel free to shoot me down in flames if you so wish, but I can't help
but feel that unless you are publishing a kosher Terminal Server the TSAC
Web Access is a waste of time, both in configuration and security as you
cannot change the port tsac listens on (yet).


If it mostly used for remote admin (as I suspect it is) then it is far
better to change the listening port and publish the server using client
access rules, also that way you can connect to more than 1 TS without any
trouble whatsoever.




Other related posts: