RE: Routing Table Question
- From: "Thor \(Hammer of God\)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:06:13 -0800
Ug. Bad ASCII!!
-----
"I'll see your Llama and up you a Badger."
John T
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: [isalist] RE: Routing Table Question
http://www.ISAserver.org
Further to that point, the "route" command utility alters the default system
routing tables, which are in effect whether RRAS is running or not. Static
routes built in RRAS are only in effect when the RRAS service is running.
While system-level (cmd) routes are recognized by the RRAS service (as
Network Managment protocol) it cannot effect/manage them. When building
routes on ISA, even if I have RRAS running, I always build them at the
system level.
t
Other related posts:
