RE: Routing
- From: "Chris Bond" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 15:46:44 -0000
> what's the purpose of the two 192.168 subnets?
In effect we have a very weird setup here - first subnet1 is general
office use, subnet2 is development.
Subnet1 has its own PDC (NT4)
Subnet2 has its own Active Directory
ISA has its own Active Directory that's accessible from both parts of
the network
> 1) both subnets must be considered internal interfaces: check if both
> subnets are in the LAT. Between internal interfaces ISA is just
performing > routing. No ISA access control is possible.
Both subnets are in the LAT, ISA routing is working correctly.
Development just cannot access subnet1 which is where our internal phone
routers are!!!
> 2) one of the subnets must be considered as a DMZ interface: that
subnet
Not sure this will help in this scenario.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bond [mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: woensdag 9 januari 2002 16:27
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] Routing
http://www.ISAserver.org
Hi,
I have an ISA Server with 3 networks cards in, on external interface to
the internet. The second for subnet1 (192.168.1.x), the third for
subnet2 (192.168.2.x).
At the moment from the 192.168.1.x side you can ping its own subnet1 and
192.168.2.x (subnet2).
From the 192.168.2.x side you ping its own subnet2 but not 192.168.1.x
(subnet1).
How can I get ISA/RRAS to route the packets on the subnet2 to subnet1?
ISA is configured so that the external network has a gateway address of
our internet router, the subnet1 and subnet2 gateways are both blank.
Can anybody shed any light to this matter?
Kind Regards,
Chris Bond
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
stefaan.pouseele@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
