Well, it's hacked together load balancing since the two servers are in different cities and obviously on different subnets. Both servers have the exact same configuration (I have a boatload of scripts I use for one-stop configging) and I use poor man's load balancing with a PAC file and dns round robin. My pac file is generated by an ASP which chooses randomly which one to put first in the ordered list of proxies it returns. -Shawn ----- Shawn R. Quillman Robert Bosch Corporation RBNA/CIT1.1 38000 Hills Tech Drive Farmington Hills, MI 48331 (248) 553-1164 (P) (248) 848-2855 (F) shawn.quillman@xxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Rich Smith [mailto:richard.s.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:08 AM To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] RE: Required Permissions http://www.ISAserver.org Shawn, Thanks. Your response is what I expected. My organization is pretty political. My team would have to settle for permissions at the array level only. Concerning your setup - how do you make use of the 2 standalone servers? Is one just a backup ready to go in the event of the primary going down? Are you using clustering and load balancing or heirarcical chaining? Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org/ Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as: shawn.quillman@xxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')