[isalist] Re: Problems with VPN from a VISTA client
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 06:29:14 -0800
Didn¹t I say all that??? ;)
t
On 2/7/07 2:25 PM, "William Holmes" <wtholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to
all:
> Hello,
>
> Under Windows XP the default gateway was not set to 0.0.0.0 when you did an
> ipconfig command. Under Vista it is set differently. At any rate it turns out
> that I had the network setting configured to be a public rather private
> network. After changing that I am able to connect through my VPN connection.
>
> The change in the default gateway was the only obvious difference between the
> network setup which is why I was questioning it.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Dan Bartley
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:09 PM
> To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isalist] Re: Problems with VPN from a VISTA client
>
> I could be wrong in interpreting this, but?
>
> You only set Use Remote Default Gateway for a VPN if you are trying to prevent
> Internet access through the NIC on the client while connected to the VPN,
> which without some static routes on the remote end means no Internet while
> connected to the VPN. At least in RRAS on a network using a different switch
> or firewall from the VPN server for external access, I¹m not sure if you can
> even do the static route on ISA to allow a route back out the external
> interface. Setting Default Gateway will have no effect on the VPN traffic
> either way, as Thor said, that is routed through the IP of the VPN interface.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Dan Bartley
>
>
> From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 14:11
> To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isalist] Re: Problems with VPN from a VISTA client
>
> The Vista VPN client does not set the ³default gateway² on the interface
> config when you establish the VPN connection. Rather, it sets the routing
> table¹s 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 destination to a low metric with the gateway set
> to ³on-link² which is functionally the same thing on a ³single VPN²
> connection. This is to better support multi-VPN / Multi-protocol (ipv4 and
> ipv6) clients in complex networks while maintaining ³security zone² settings.
> The ³on-link² interface maintains security zone configurations where a
> standard gateway/interface default gateway won¹t.
>
> When you connect, check your routing table (³route print²) and you¹ll see the
> on-link gateway set to the interface ip given by your server.
>
> I¹d say you¹ve got some other configuration issue. What exactly doesn¹t work?
>
> t
>
>
> On 2/6/07 1:53 PM, "William Holmes" <wtholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all:
> Hello,
>
> I know this is slightly off topic but?? I am having trouble connecting to my
> ISA 2004 server from my Vista Client. I have the connection configured to use
> the default gateway on the remote network. However the default route for the
> (VPN PPP) adapter is never set. The adapter is assigned a IP address and a
> Network Mask but no default route. Under Windows XP a default route is
> assigned to the adapter so IP traffic can flow. I have never had any trouble
> with my XP clients.
>
> Can anyone explain to me how to fix this problem. Not being able to use VPN
> networks is a real problem.
>
> This is Windows Visa Ultimate. Connecting to ISA2004. XP clients work fine.
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill
>
>
Other related posts:
