RE: Not ISA content, but windows 2000 pro.

From: "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:58:41 -0600

Mark,

I'm sure John was wanting to help, that's all. This is a great group,
and sometimes things don't come across exactly how we intend in emails.
We've all been there, and its never a lot of fun. But everything is
cool, so let's move on to more important issues, like how to get MSN
Messenger voice/video working through the ISA Server ;-)

Tom

Thomas W Shinder
www.isaserver.org/shinder 
ISA Server and Beyond: http://tinyurl.com/1jq1
Configuring ISA Server: http://tinyurl.com/1llp


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Strangways [mailto:strangconst@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:54 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: Not ISA content, but windows 2000 pro.


http://www.ISAserver.org


John, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

I believe we have been through this just minutes earlier. While I very
much
appreciate your statement above. I did not know that I was violating a
license agreement, as all machine are licensed. I believe Thomas had
corrected me prior in perhaps a more polite way.
If being MSCE means replies like yours with the implied tones I read
into
it, then I don't want ANYTHING to do with it. But luckily I know better.

I am not going to start a flame war here. !!! I asked a question, it may
have been an inappropriate question I will not argue that. There are
better
ways to phrase a response though.
I have been here a LONG time, I know that people ask seemingly harmless
questions, but I have not seen a response like I read into this. Am I
just
reading it wrong ? If so, then please disregard and accept my apologies.

I sincerely apologize to the entire list for asking such a question and
thank most of you for the reply's sent. I also apologize for this thread
as
it should be keep private, but...

regards,

Mark S

RE: Not ISA content, but windows 2000 pro.

Other related posts: