Hi Peter, NO!!! The entire point was to make the ISA firewall a domain member. Its only the compliance testers with clipboarditis that sometime "require" that the ISA firewall be removed from the domain. HTH, Tom www.isaserver.org/shinder Tom and Deb Shinder's Configuring ISA Server 2004 http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 MVP -- ISA Firewalls > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter [mailto:pladd@xxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 6:37 AM > To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] > Subject: [isalist] RE: L2TP Using eToken > > http://www.ISAserver.org > > So would your posture be that it is preferable to take ISA > off the domain? > > ------------------------------------------------------ > List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist > ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp > ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ > ------------------------------------------------------ > Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: > World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com > Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com > No.1 Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org > Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ > Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ > Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com > ------------------------------------------------------ > You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion > List as: tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe visit > http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist > Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >
