[isalist] Re: It's official: Autocorrect Entry changed to SecureNET

  • From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:06:18 -0700

http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------

Neither; it's what the ISA doc team and I were shooting for before ISA 2004 
shipped, but somehow it didn't make it. 


-------------------------------------------------------
   Jim Harrison
   MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
   http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/
   http://isatools.org
   Read the help / books / articles!
-------------------------------------------------------
 

-----Original Message-----
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Wayne Small
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 12:57
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] Re: It's official: Autocorrect Entry changed to SecureNET

http://www.ISAserver.org
-------------------------------------------------------
  
For the ignorant (me included) is this in line with MS standard terminology or 
is this a "Shinderism" ;-) 


Regards,
Wayne Small  [SBS-MVP]
MCSE+I  MCSE 2000
Technical Director - Correct Solutions Pty Ltd

Microsoft Small Business Specialist
Finalist - 2005 Microsoft Australia Solution of the Year award - Small Business 
Category Co-author of Advanced Windows Small Business Server 2003 Best 
Practices For all the answers on Microsoft's Small Business Server- check out 
www.sbsfaq.com

-----Original Message-----
From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder
Sent: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 2:18 AM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] It's official: Autocorrect Entry changed to SecureNET

After talking with Jim at TechEd, I've decided that in the interest of accuracy 
and precision in the ISA firewall nomenclature, that I am going to change my 
Autocorrect Entry in Word for snat from SecureNAT to SecureNET. The reason for 
this is that given the new ISA firewall networking model, you can't assume that 
the source and destination Networks for SecureNAT clients are NATed, thus 
SecureNET is the more accurate description of this client type.
 
Just thought you might like to know :)
 
later,
Tom
 
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> MVP -- ISA Firewalls

 
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/
ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 


All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.

------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/
ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: