Re: ISA hardware redundancy?
- From: "Jim Harrison" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 17:28:34 -0800
My train of thought often leaves folks at the station (sometimes me along
with them), so don't sweat it... ;-)
What I was referring to is that for any redundancy solution to be truly
effective, it shouldn't reside on the servers it's meant to redun.
load balancing switches exist and Foundry, Cisco, 3Com are but a few of them
. I've used Foundry devices and was well pleased with their performance and
configuration methodology.
Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
http://isaserver.org/authors/harrison/
Read the book!
----- Original Message -----
From: <jshanks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 14:03
Subject: [isalist] Re: ISA hardware redundancy?
http://www.ISAserver.org
Not sure I follow your thought. Our ISA server is acting as our NAT, dns,
dhcp and firewall. At this point in our network creation I am a bit
worried about it going down. So I am worried about the server.
Jim
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
Other related posts:
