RE: Exchange front-end and back-end configuration thoughts...DMZ

  • From: "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:25:35 -0500

Hi Marvin,
What's wrong with FE/BE? I've used ISA to protect this config early and
often.

What article did you read that said FE/BE was bad?
Thanks!
Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: MarvinC [mailto:marvinc@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 3:20 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] Exchange front-end and back-end configuration
thoughts...DMZ

http://www.ISAserver.org

I'm wondering if anyone care to share their thoughts on configuring an
Exchange 2003 front-end back-end setup. I've read a few articles, well
one, that states this is a bad idea and I'm wondering if there are
other ways to do this using ISA2K4?
Any responses are appreciated.

------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




Other related posts: