http://www.ISAserver.org ------------------------------------------------------- Hi Dan Both ISA Servers (Integrated & Proxy Mode) are authenticating outgoing WEB requests based on Basic & Integrated authentication methods. Naturally my test ISA Proxy mode server only has 2 or 3 requests, whereas my Integrated ISA has ~100. -----Original Message----- From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ball, Dan Sent: 16 May 2006 02:30 PM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: Cache Mode ISA faster than Integrated Mode ISA... http://www.ISAserver.org ------------------------------------------------------- Which server is doing the authentication? I've seen here where masses of authentication requests can bring the ISA server down to a crawl at times. -----Original Message----- From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of William Robertson Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:49 AM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: Cache Mode ISA faster than Integrated Mode ISA... http://www.ISAserver.org ------------------------------------------------------- Hi Greg/John Network wise there is definitely no difference between response times as they are both sitting on 1Gb connections. I am 100% sure that the slower response is as a result of my actual/primary ISA2000 firewall. As mentioned, it is running with a lot more users and a WEB Filter. My logic tells me that the congestion is not on my 512k Diginet external/internet connection, as while I am surfing at higher speeds through the test/temporary ISA Proxy server, my users are surfing slower through the actual/primary ISA Firewall server. So the slower response is definitely as a result of the Integrated ISA server. I just wouldn't have expected so much noticeable comparison between the 2 though... Are there perhaps any performance counters that one can measure when looking at a problem like this? Thanks William R. -----Original Message----- From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Mulholland Sent: 16 May 2006 10:35 AM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Re: Cache Mode ISA faster than Integrated Mode ISA... http://www.ISAserver.org ------------------------------------------------------- Are the network response times to both boxes similar? Ie. Its definitely the integrated isa box that's causing the slowness and not network structure? Greg Mulholland 'Security was not considered in the design of this protocol' -----Original Message----- From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of William Robertson Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 3:27 PM To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isalist] Cache Mode ISA faster than Integrated Mode ISA... http://www.ISAserver.org ------------------------------------------------------- Hi there I have an ISA Server 2000 firewall set up in Integrated Mode, and she has been chugging along happily for quite a few years now. We are currently investigating a problem (not specifically with ISA) and have had a reason to thus install ISA in Cache Mode Only, on a test server. What I have since found interesting is that when I change my WEB Proxy settings to make use of the test ISA, my surfing is a *LOT* faster than when through my current Integrated Mode ISA. I can appreciate that my Integrated Mode ISA has more work to do, being an actual firewall 'n all, and it also has much more users running through it, and it also has the SurfControl WEB Filter installed... but does this all account for a *MUCH* faster WEB surfing experience? Thanks William R. ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/isalist/ ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp ISA Server Articles and Tutorials: http://www.isaserver.org/articles_tutorials/ ISA Server Blogs: http://blogs.isaserver.org/ ------------------------------------------------------ Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites: http://www.techgenix.com ------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe visit http://www.isaserver.org/pages/isalist.asp Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx