Re: 815052 - Windows XP-Based Clients Do Not Receive "New Mail" Notification Messages After You Install Service Pack 1
- From: "Deus, Attonbitus" <Thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 07:29:59 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 05:32 PM 3/5/2003, you wrote:
>The whole issue is very interesting. I have XP SP1 machines that
>don't seem to have this problem, even though XP SP1 is installed.
Same here.
>I have to ask "what is it about SP1 that alledgedly broke things and
>what does adding the domain to the LDT supposedly fix things?"
Exactly!
>If the UDP packet is from the Exchange Server on the same network,
>and if the XP firewall thing isn't enabled, when what's the problem?
>The Firewall client doesn't handle LAT based connections, and
>doesn't handle incoming connections, unless they're part of an
>ongoing session with the Firewall service. So, which is so special
>about these Exchange new mail modification messages? I suppose its
>time for a packet sniff -- but how the LDT enters into the mix is
>quite odd, since the LDT is just used for determining how a name
>should be resolved.
My thoughts as well... If the UDP packet is coming FROM the Exchange
Server, what difference does it make if I have the FW client
installed on
my box or not? And in fact, it does not- I personally do not think
this
has anything at all do to with the FW client or ISA, unless there is
some
funky-ness going on when you have the FW installed WHEN you load XP
SP1.
I removed the FW client from my box, ensured I was not a SNAT client,
no
proxy settings- basically made my system a regular-old network node
with no
outside access, sat in Outlook on Send Items, telnetted into the
Exchange
box on the same network, sent myself a message, and go no
notification- I
had to click on Inbox to see it. Again, this is without any FW
client or
anything to do with ISA... Except for the fact that the Exchange
Server is
a SNAT client. But if that were the case, it would be that way for
ALL my
XP clients with SP1, not just a few. What is the likelyhood that
having
the FW client installed when you apply SP1 has something to do with
it? I
guess I"ll have to test that...
t
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBPmdpeohsmyD15h5gEQJ1EACgh61vfIzDR3xTPRTcI9dWCM04bscAn2mA
dkqJxwX+YkjnZq6niW3mQ6PM
=CTBs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
