RE: 120 day eval.
- From: "Kevin S. Malinowski" <Kevin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:35:22 -0700
Hi, Jim.
Now you have my curiosity peaked. You have regenerated two questions.
1. If the build difference isn't the mitigating factor as to why it isn't a
straight upgrade, what is the reason? Not that the uninstall and reinstall with
a backed up config is difficult or overly time consuming, but it would by nice
to understand.
2. I am now more curious as to why SP1 can't be applied to the eval version.
From a marketing perspective I consider this the be a huge problem. (Give the
potential customers a piece of software that is broken and can't be fixed (at
least easily) to evaluate.
Thanks
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Harrison [mailto:jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:12 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: 120 day eval.
http://www.ISAserver.org
Actually, you're both right and wrong.
The ISA eval version is a different build than the release, but that's not
the gating factor.
You'll notice that when you apply hotfixes that the ISA version reported is
also changed.
Take a look at your version column after applying a hotfix or SP1. The last
digit set changes to indicate your hotfix level.
Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG
http://isaserver.org/authors/harrison/
Read the books!
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: 1/11/2002
Other related posts:
