[Indaemed_Freelist.Org] Re: [indaemed] Re: NMS
- From: Lt Col KK Tripathi <tripfamily@xxxxxxxx>
- To: indaemed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:06:36 +0530
Dear Anirudh,
The candidate does not have any family commitment. As far as I remember, he
has an elder brother settled in life.
Motivation to flying was adequate.
It was not the candidate but the medical fraternity which was apprehensive
in putting him back to cockpit.
With regards,
Lt Col KK Tripathi
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anirudh Agrawal" <anirudh_aa@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <indaemed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "IndAeMed Coollist" <indaemed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 9:08 PM
Subject: [indaemed] Re: NMS
> Dear List,
>
> I get the feeling that all the discussion on this subject has been without
the
> full information on the table. Like Tripathi sir said all the test results
> would be in his board docs. But there a number of things that would not be
in
> the docs.
>
> There was a mention of his having lost his parents in his childhood and of
his
> being taken out of flying with a view to "save his life" - as mentioned on
the
> list. To save his life for whom / what? Does he have some family
> responsibilities? Some sister to marry off, etc ?
>
> By the way is he ex-NDA or CDSE? What was his motivation to join NDA/CDSE?
Was
> it a job? Did he want to be a pilot? Or did he join because someone told
him
> to? Did he know what he was getting into?
>
> Was a psychometric analysis for motivation to fly and fear of flying done?
> Stress handling? How was his performance in flying subjects? Does he
really
> want to get back into the cockpit or is he just trying to maintain a brave
> face?
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but to me it maybe a case where the guy (cadet)
> didn't want to get into the cockpit due to the various stresses in his
life and
> the 'DOC' (read IAM) was only trying to help him out! We all do it
sometimes! I
> have seen many an army recruit in trg centres in Bangalore boarded out for
> "Adjustment Disorder" because when he joined he did not know what he was
> getting into and just could not adjust to the training and the change in
> lifestyle!
>
> Moreover, isn't "proneness" just not another word for probability and
chance?
> And isn't that the basis for the 1% rule? So why are we so against the use
of
> proneness to decide the disposal when the entire lot of medical policies
based
> on the 1% rule esp in Civ Av (ICAO) (I remember an example quoted in
Ernsting
> to explain the 1% rule) ?
>
> And finally, I personally believe if Kulkarni sir has taken a decision -
he may
> not be telling all - but he has to have his reasons!
>
> Regards,
> Anirudh
>
> --- dilish malik <dilishmalik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 USM Bish wrote :
> > >On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 03:40:31PM +1300, Pooshan Navathe wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> > > >
> > > > Must disagree. Politely but strongly.
> > >
> > >I don't think I have made my point clear ... what both Anuj and
> > >you are talking about is NOT the "proneness" that I intend to
> > >convey. What you are talking about are known or expected
>
> [snipped]
>
> > >--------------------------</unquote>---------------------------
> > >
>
> [snipped]
>
> > >
> > >Bish
> >
>
> [snipped]
>
> > cross FL 300. I still feel his motivation to fly and his personality
type
> > should have been kept in mind before deciding his grounding.
> > Just a mundane thought from A man from the fieldCheers Dilish
>
>
>
> =====
> Sqn Ldr Anirudh Agrawal
> Senior Medical Officer
> Indian Aviation Contingent
> MONUC
> GOMA, CONGO(DRC)
>
> POST /Snail Mail from INDIA:
> SQN LDR ANIRUDH AGRAWAL
> SMO
> IAF CONTINGENT
> MONUC(CONGO)
> C/O 1 CBPO
> C/O 56 APO
>
> E-mail: anirudh_a@xxxxxxxxxxx
> anirudh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> indiacont-med@xxxxxx
>
> Mobile : +243-818998339
>
> IAF Exchange: +243-81890-8552/8603
> FAX : +243-81890-8600
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Other related posts:
- » [Indaemed_Freelist.Org] Re: [indaemed] Re: NMS
