[PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.5.1

  • From: Michael.Catrambone@xxxxxxxxxx
  • To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:11:16 -0600


One thing to note, the New DFA tool is only available
if you are using Allegro 610 or higher.  We just upgraded
our current Allegro licenses to Allegro 610 so we can
get the functionality.

Mike





"Musetti, Carl" <cmusetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>@freelists.org on 12/12/2005
03:48:44 PM

Please respond to icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent by:    icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To:    <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:    [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.5.1


This is a part of the new DFA tool

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Carman [mailto:gcarman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 4:38 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.5.1


I was under the impression that 15.5 was going to have a spreadsheet like
constraint tool for parts placement, that would allow the designer to have
different rules for different part types and would be "live" like the
routing DRCs... not post placement batch driven.

Is this not the case?

-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of richard moffat
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 1:01 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.5.1



I agree.  This would be really useful.

You can define parallelism in the CM, but I believe I'm correct in saying
it doesn't DRC in real-time.  (Can someone verify this?)

I also take it you mean for edge-coupled and not broadside.  (I thing
broadside would be a whole new can of worms.)



>>>ONE THAT I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE FOR PRIORITY CONSIDERATION - ROUTE AND
SLIDE WORKING WITH PARALLELISM CONSTRAINTS
What's the list's opinions'?

>>> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 13/12/2005 9:42 a.m. >>>

Don't think so, but have not checked sourcelink this week.

The list below seems to be complete


...
...

Best Regards

David Greig
______________________________

...

www.gigadyne.co.uk <http://www.gigadyne.co.uk/>
______________________________


  _____

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JACK KELLY
...


we don't have 15.5.1 loaded yet. is there a way to read the what's new for
release 15.5.1 prior to down loading it?

  _____

From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
rjbzxr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:41 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
...



NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the addressee
named above. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message you are hereby notified that you must not
disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.
If you have received this message in error please
notify Allied Telesyn Research Ltd immediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender has the
authority to issue and specifically states them to
be the views of Allied Telesyn Research.

(See attached file: C.htm)


This is a part of the new DFA tool
-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Carman [mailto:gcarman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 4:38 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.5.1

I was under the impression that 15.5 was going to have a spreadsheet like constraint tool for parts placement, that would allow the designer to have different rules for different part types and would be "live" like the routing DRCs... not post placement batch driven. 
 
Is this not the case?
-----Original Message-----
From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of richard moffat
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 1:01 PM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PCB_FORUM] Re: 15.5.1

 
I agree.  This would be really useful. 
 
You can define parallelism in the CM, but I believe I'm correct in saying it doesn't DRC in real-time.  (Can someone verify this?) 
 
I also take it you mean for edge-coupled and not broadside.  (I thing broadside would be a whole new can of worms.)
 
 
 
>>>ONE THAT I WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE FOR PRIORITY CONSIDERATION - ROUTE AND SLIDE WORKING WITH PARALLELISM CONSTRAINTS
What's the list's opinions'?

>>> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 13/12/2005 9:42 a.m. >>>
Don't think so, but have not checked sourcelink this week.
 
The list below seems to be complete
...
...
 
Best Regards
 
David Greig
______________________________
...
 
______________________________
 


From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of JACK KELLY
...

we don't have 15.5.1 loaded yet. is there a way to read the what's new for release 15.5.1 prior to down loading it?


From: icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rjbzxr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:41 AM
To: icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
...
 


NOTICE: This message contains privileged and confidential
information intended only for the use of the addressee
named above. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message you are hereby notified that you must not
disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.
If you have received this message in error please
notify Allied Telesyn Research Ltd immediately.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender has the
authority to issue and specifically states them to
be the views of Allied Telesyn Research.

Other related posts: