[ibis-macro] Re: Vote in the next ATM meeting
- From: David Banas <DBanas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>, IBIS-ATM <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:44:40 -0700
Hi Arpad,
I just want to clarify what I think I hear you saying.
It sounds like there are 3 options for this "vote":
1. Don't ever attempt to do back-channel modeling statistically.
2. Attempt to do back-channel modeling statistically, but not now.
3. Demand that we move statistical and time-domain back-channel modeling
forward, together.
Do I have it correct?
Thanks,
-db
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 4:22 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Vote in the next ATM meeting
Hello everyone,
We had a discussion on BIRD 147 (Backchannel) in the last ATM
teleconference. Several concerns were raised about the BIRD,
but the biggest issue seemed to be that the BIRD does not
include the statistical flow, only the time domain flow. Since
we weren't able to make a decision whether the statistical flow
should be supported, a suggestion was made to take a vote on
this question. Since we were running short on time, we decided
to conduct the vote in the upcoming ATM teleconference (April 1st)
to decide whether the BIRD should include the statistical flow
or not. Another option is to start a new BIRD for the backchannel
features in the statistical flow, but the consensus seemed to be
that if we include the statistical flow, it should be done now
together with BIRD 147 so that we would not get into conflicts
between the two flows.
I am sending this email to this email reflector to notify everyone
about this informal vote. Please spend a little time to think
about the question and come to the meeting ready with your choice.
If you can't make it to the meeting, you may submit your vote
to me in email either as a reply to this message, or privately
if you want to remain anonymous.
Thank you all for your support.
Arpad
=====================================================================
________________________________
Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise
protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or
copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail,
and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
Other related posts:
