[ibis-macro] Re: The EMD like syntax of package and on-die interconnect models
- From: "Walter Katz" <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'Scott McMorrow'" <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:02:41 -0400 (EDT)
Scott,
There is more than one way to skin a cat. There are crosstalk
methodologies that do not care about victim and aggressors. There are
crosstalk methodologies that do care which terminals are victims and
aggressors. An IC vendor can and will choose the way they are going to
construct and distribute these models. We need to be able to support both
methodologies.
Walter
From: Scott McMorrow [mailto:scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:38 PM
To: Walter Katz
Cc: IBIS-ATM; Randy Wolff
Subject: Re: [ibis-macro] The EMD like syntax of package and on-die
interconnect models
i disagree with victim aggressor constructs. All that needs to be known
is the location of the drivers and receivers, and grouping of such for a
general solution.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Walter Katz <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,
I am enclosing a presentation which demonstrates the simple language used
to describe both the package and on-die interconnect models using the EMD
like methodology applied to all of the types of models that IC Vendors are
requesting to deliver.
Walter
Walter Katz
wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone 303.449-2308
Mobile 303.335-6156
--
Scott McMorrow
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
16 Stormy Brook Rd
Falmouth, ME 04105
(401) 284-1827 Business
http://www.teraspeed.com
TeraspeedR is the registered service mark of
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
Other related posts:
