[ibis-macro] Straw Poll vote on IBIS-ISS Package Modeling

  • From: "Walter Katz" <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "IBIS-ATM" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:19:23 -0400 (EDT)

All,

 

I have put 28 questions in a spreadsheet. I think it will take too much
time to do the voting in the meeting, so I request that you put entries
1:4 in column 1 of each question. The meanings of 1:4 are.

 


4

Advocate   I need this!


3

Support      I support this


2

Abstain       I have no opinion


1

Object         I object to this functionality

 

Return them to me or all IBIS-ATM and I will collate the results and
publish them by Tuesday AM. I am including the .xlsx file in case you have
difficulty editing the spreadsheet in the body of this e-mail. Also
including this and last weeks presentation.

 

Walter

 


4

Advocate   I need this!


3

Support      I support this


2

Abstain       I have no opinion


1

Object         I object to this functionality


 

 


 

Should we add keywords Pullup_Signal_name, Pulldown_Signal_name,
Power_clamp_Signal_name, and Ground_clamp_Signal_name to the [Model]
section?


 

Should we add a section to the .ibs file to define the voltage values of
supply signal names?


 

Should we add a list of supply die pad names?


 

Should we add an x-y coordinate for each pin and die pad?


 

 


 

Should we support two signal pins connected to the same die pad (Forked
Signal)?


 

Should we be able to associate a package model with a [Model]?


 

Should we be able to associate a package model with a Pin_name?


 

Should we be able to associate a coupled package model with a [Model]?


 

Should we be able to associate a coupled package model with a list of
Pin_names?


 

Should we support package models with coupling between signals and power?


 

Should we support a coupled package model that hooks up to two or more
[Model] names?


 

Should we support package models with more than 3 corners?


 

Should we support package Touchstone files directly?


 

Should we support sparse usage of large package Touchstone files?


 

Should we support package "Quadrants" (e.g. Banks, Interfaces)?


 

Should we support full package models?


 

 


 

Should we support on-die models?


 

Should we be able to associate an on-die model with a [Model]?


 

Should we be able to associate an on-die model with a Pin_name?


 

Should we be able to associate a coupled on-die model with a [Model]?


 

Should we be able to associate a coupled on-die model with a list of
Pin_names?


 

Should we support on-die models with coupling between signals and power?


 

Should we support a coupled on-die model that hooks up to two or more
[Model] names?


 

Should we support on-die models with more than 3 corners?


 

Should we support on-die Touchstone files directly?


 

Should we support sparse usage of large on-die Touchstone files?


 

Should we support on-die "Quadrants" (e.g. Banks, Interfaces)?


 

Should we support full on-die models?

 

 

Walter Katz

 <mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx> wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx

Phone 303.449-2308

Mobile 303.335-6156

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. ibis-macro
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2012