[ibis-macro] Re: Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last week was incorrect.

  • From: "Walter Katz" <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ambrishv@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'IBIS-ATM'" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:59:53 -0500 (EST)

Ambrish,

 

You are correct. Read once, send three times. Here is a corrected version.

 

Walter

 

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ambrish Varma
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:48 AM
To: 'IBIS-ATM'
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD
last week was incorrect.

 

Hi Walter,

If I am not wrong, there is a slight problem with your example.

 

Instead of 

"The impulse matrix to input RxV is  

 

SDD(RxV,TxV)' SDD(RxV,Tx1)' SDD(Rx2,Tx2)' 

 

The impulse response output of RxV is 

 

SDD(RxV,TxV)'' SDD(RxV,Tx1)'' SDD(Rx2,Tx2)''     (All three include RxV
filter)"

 

Shouldn't it be:

"The impulse matrix to input RxV is  

 

SDD(RxV,TxV)' SDD(RxV,Tx1)' SDD(RxV,Tx2)' 

 

The impulse response output of RxV is 

 

SDD(RxV,TxV)'' SDD(RxV,Tx1)'' SDD(RxV,Tx2)''     (All three include RxV
filter)"

 

Thanks,

-Ambrish.







 


Ambrish Varma   |  Member of Consulting Staff


P: 978.262.6431    <http://www.cadence.com> www.cadence.com


 





 

 

 

  _____  

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:53 AM
To: Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx; 'IBIS-ATM'
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD
last week was incorrect.

 

Arpad,

 

Here it is again, one page, and some minor modifications. I do not care if
this example is in the BIRD, a reference in the minutes is sufficient for
me, but I have no objection if it is included. I think a request was mad
for a graohic example, as opposed to a mathematical example.

 

Walter

 

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:39 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD
last week was incorrect.

 

Walter,

 

Is the 2nd page "left intentionally blank" in the PDF you

sent in the attachment?  If so, would you mind removing it

and send it to us again so we could post a single page

document?  Did you want this example in the BIRD also (and

ultimately in the spec)?  Someone suggested in the previous

meetings that examples would be good, but I don't remember

for which BIRD it was suggested.

 

Thanks,

 

Arpad

============================================================

 

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 8:59 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last
week was incorrect.

 

All,

 

Mea Culpa, my critique of the Crosstalk BIRD last week was incorrect.
After a careful read I totally agree with the contents of the BIRD and
would support a motion to submit it to the Open Forum, with this
committees concurrence.

 

Not for Naught!

 

I did document an example of a coupled system containing a single victim
channel and two aggressor channels. The various elements of the Impulse
Response are defined using Touchstone notation, and the input and output
of the impulse response matrix for each Tx and Rx AMI_Init function call
is defined by rows and columns in the differential mode, coupled sNp that
represents any coupled channel.

 

I would like this document posted, and I would like the weekly minutes to
note it.

 

Walter

 

 

 

 

Walter Katz

wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx

Phone 303.449-2308

Mobile 303.883-2120

 

GIF image

GIF image

Other related posts: