[ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
- From: "Paul Fernando" <prfernan@xxxxxxxx>
- To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 20:26:26 -0500 (EST)
It was a minor bug after all.
On Wed, February 8, 2006 7:56 pm, Muranyi, Arpad wrote:
> One more thing, it seems that the Verilog and VHDL
> sides do the same thing as far as the ordering
> problem goes, I may have gotten confused about that
> when I was rushing to my meeting...
>
> Arpad
> ====================================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Muranyi, Arpad
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:55 PM
> To: 'prfernan@xxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
>
> Paul,
>
> Forgot to mention that in this version I started to see
> messages in the DOS window about "Swapped ... " which
> you should turn off. I am not interested in seeing this
> (seems to be a debug feature you put in there) and it
> sounds a little scary for the novice...
>
> Arpad
> ========================================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Muranyi, Arpad
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:53 PM
> To: 'prfernan@xxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
>
> Paul,
>
> Please try the attached file. Just to reiterate,
> r1 should have the table that has a LOWER Vfixture
> value than the table that goes into r2, and f1
> should have the table that has a HIGHER Vfixture
> than the table that goes into f2.
>
> Interestingly, when I used the buffers in the lab_1.ibs
> file, the order was correct. From this I suspect that
> your compare does something differently depending on
> whether Vfixture is equal to the supply voltages compared
> when it is something else (which is what this test file
> does).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Arpad
> ====================================================-----Original Message-----
> From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Paul Fernando
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 3:57 PM
> To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
>
> I fixed #2.
> I can't recreate #1. And like you said, its odd that this is happening. Could
> you give
> me a sequence to re-create the condition?
>
Other related posts:
