All,
While we had intended to discuss IBIS Version 7.0 Aggressor_Only syntax
rules at the Interconnect Task Group, we also plan to discuss this topic at
the ATM Task Group. Several key people should be attending at ATM.
The attached rules are for the parser developer to implement and test.
Two questions:
Should having Aggressor_Only on ALL [Interconnect Model] *_/I/O terminals be
an ERROR or WARNING? (Technically that [Interconnect Model] cannot be
used.)
If an [Interconnect Model] contains an Aggressor_Only terminal line, should
both interfaces with the same pin_name be marked Aggressor_Only?
The verbiage in IBIS Version 7.0 is not clear on page 306, bottom - does
"identified" mean "marked" or "interpreted"?
"Within any Interconnect Model, if a terminal line is identified as
Aggressor_Only, then the corresponding terminal line associated with the
same pin_name shall also be identified as Aggressor_Only."
Bob
--
Bob Ross
Teraspeed Labs
www.teraspeedlabs.com <http://www.teraspeedlabs.com/>
bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Direct: 503-246-8048
Office: 971-279-5325
Attachment:
aggressor_only2.docx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document