[ibis-macro] Re: Format as optional

  • From: Ambrish Varma <ambrishv@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'IBIS-ATM'" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:55:17 -0700

Ken,
Here is Cadence's position:
We make use of the Format keyword quite a lot and our parser does not ignore it 
but uses it. Somewhere in our flow, instead of looking for the various formats 
(range, value, corners etc (or any other future format)) our parser just checks 
for the word 'Format'. So if it is eliminated, we would have to add it to make 
the current flow work - or change our flow.

Ugly as it might be - it is quite useful.

Thanks,
Ambrish. 


 
 
 
 
Ambrish Varma   |  Member of Consulting Staff
P: 978.262.6431   www.cadence.com
 
 
 
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Ken Willis
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 3:01 PM
To: 'IBIS-ATM'
Subject: [ibis-macro] Format as optional

Hello all,

I sent this out a while back and never got any feedback, so I figured I
would ask one more time. I believe I already know Mentor's and SISoft's
position on this one, but does anybody else have any comments?

Thanks,
 
Ken Willis
Sigrity, Inc.
860-871-7070
kwillis@xxxxxxxxxxx
 
-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ken Willis
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx; 'IBIS-ATM'
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-ATM teleconference - Agenda for 9/14/2010 >
Format

Hi Arpad,

Here is the feedback on "Format" which you requested me to send through
email.

If we were completely doing away with Format, that would be one thing. But
the current proposal is to still support that, plus also support NOT having
it there. It doesn't seem like we are really simplifying anything then;
instead we are adding more things that will need to be supported. I think
that is going in the wrong direction, adding more complexity to the spec.

The software coding purists don't like Format, but if it is there already,
and it isn't going to go away, then adding support for Format's ABSENCE is
more trouble than it is worth.

This is just one opinion of course, and I am curious to see if anybody else
agrees. It seems like there are bigger fish to fry than this one.

Thanks,
 
Ken Willis
Sigrity, Inc.
860-871-7070
kwillis@xxxxxxxxxxx
 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

Other related posts: