[ibis-macro] Re: BIRD 158.3 - 2

  • From: "Walter Katz" <wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'IBIS-ATM'" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:42:48 -0400 (EDT)

All,

 

I have made the changes requested by Bob and Arpad (enclosed). Any
additional comments before I send the formal version to Michael this
afternoon would be appreciated.

 

Walter

 

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 10:03 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: BIRD 158.3

 

Walter,

 

Here are my comments on this BIRD draft.

 

 

What does "differential transmission" mean in this sentence:

"This Impulse Response characterizes the differential transmission of the
Tx analog buffer model,"?

Could you make this clearer with better wording?

 

In the following sentence you are talking about the "die side

of the package":

"For a Tx buffer, the Transmitter Circuit defines the analog buffer model
between the zero impedance stimulus input voltage source and the die side
of the package model. For an Rx buffer, the Receiver Circuit defines the
analog buffer model between the die side of the package model and a high
impedance probe at the input to the Rx Algorithmic model."

However, it is not clear whether this means that the buffer model

described by the data in the Touchstone file can/should also

include the on-die interconnect or not.  I think this should

be clearly stated otherwise different people will make different

assumptions to model on-die interconnects.

 

This sentence:

"Note that this Touchstone analog model only represent the on-die model
between the die pad and buffer interface to the algorithmic model"

is somewhat misleading, because it can be interpreted as if the

Touchstone model is **the** on-die interconnect model between the

pad and the buffer's terminals ("buffer interface").

 

You use the words "unit excitation".  This sentence:

"This BIRD defines what that unit excitation is when the Tsonefile
parameter is present."

really doesn't make sense, because by definition a unit = 1,

i.e. the "unit excitation" would have to have a fixed and

predefined magnitude of 1 volt, yet in this BIRD you define

Tx_Voh and Tx_Vol, which is not "unit" anymore.  Also, please

correct the spelling of "Tsonefile" in this sentence (missing

"t").

 

You mention in the discussion of the Impulse Response generation

that the Tstonefile parameter is a Reserved Parameter, but you

don't say anywhere in the document whether the rest of the parameters

in this BIRD are Reserved or Model_Specific.  Please specify what

you want them to be.

 

I would also like to request to put a "0" before and after each

decimal point for properness.  For example, instead of "(Range 1. .5 1.)"

please write "(Range  1.0  0.5  1.0)", it is much more readable that way.

 

Thanks,

 

Arpad

======================================================================

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 9:04 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] BIRD 158.3

 

All,

 

Please review version 158.3 (Tstonefile AMI models) before I send the
final version to Michael tomorrow afternoon.

 

The major change is that there are now two Tx voltage levels (Tx_Vol and
Tx_Voh) that determine the differential step response stimulus that is
assumed for generating the Impulse Response of the channel. This make
BIRD158 Tstonefile models directly convertible to BIRD 160 external
models, and gives the model maker the ability to determine the common mode
voltage when generating the Impulse Response of a channel.

 

Walter

 

Walter Katz

wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx

Phone 303.449-2308

Mobile 303.335-6156

 

Attachment: BIRD_158.3.docx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

Other related posts: