Sure, but where/what is the rule in the specification about what the EDA tool should do about this? Arpad ====================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Walter Katz [mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:05 AM To: Muranyi, Arpad; ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Re: An interesting question for the holidays... Arpad, If you recall, if the Tx is LTI both flows give the same answer. If the Tx is not LTI, the 5.0 flow is wrong! Walter -----Original Message----- From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:46 AM To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: An interesting question for the holidays... True, but I still see models without the AMI_Version parameter in the .ami file, which means that they assume the v5.0 flow. What if the channel has one of those models on one end and a v5.1 or later model on the other end? This may happen very easily and the spec should state what the EDA tool should do in this case. Is this a valid combination to run a simulation? If so which flow should be used? If not, should the EDA tool just issue an error and stop? Thanks, Arpad ================================================================= -----Original Message----- From: Walter Katz [mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:05 PM To: Muranyi, Arpad; ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] An interesting question for the holidays... Arpad, The 5.0 flow was broke - the 5.1 flow was, and is the only correct flow. Walter -----Original Message----- From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:19 PM To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ibis-macro] An interesting question for the holidays... Hello Everyone, I ran into a situation with an AMI model pair (Tx and Rx) where the two models have a different AMI_Version value. Fortunately these are 5.1 and 6.0 which imply the same AMI flow. But I wonder what should the EDA tool do if one model is v5.0 (implicitly) and another model is v5.1 or higher, because the v5.0 AMI flow is different from the flow defined for v5.1 or higher. I don't recall anything in the specification that defines which flow should be used in this case. Does anyone know what the EDA tool should do in this case? Simulate with one or the other flow, or issue an error and not simulate at all? Enjoy your day! Arpad ==================================================================== --------------------------------------------------------------------- IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/ IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro To unsubscribe send an email: To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: unsubscribe --------------------------------------------------------------------- IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/ IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro To unsubscribe send an email: To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: unsubscribe --------------------------------------------------------------------- IBIS Macro website : http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/ IBIS Macro reflector: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro To unsubscribe send an email: To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: unsubscribe