[ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM teleconference

  • From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "IBIS-ATM" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 07:15:22 -0700

What is that "one slight correction" that
you think needs to be done?

Arpad
========================================= 

-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ambrish Varma
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:52 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM teleconference

Arpad,
One more thing. What you presented yesterday was a flow chart for
section 2.3. We should look at this section in conjunction with 2.1 and
2.2 and not a standalone section by itself. If we do that, then what you
presented makes sense (with one slight correction).

Thanks,
Ambrish.

-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:37 AM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM teleconference

That's exactly what I presented in the flow diagram I
prepared for today, but we are still not in agreement.

The comments we are getting from Walter indicate that
the entire flow is flawed and he suggests to go back
to the flow we finished in November.  The comments we
are getting from Kumar and Ken indicates that they
would prefer to further simplify the flow, not allowing
for the dual nature of LTI and non-LTI coexisting
together in the same model.

How shall we resolve this disagreement?

Arpad
========================================================




-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ambrish Varma
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:27 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM teleconference

Arpad,
What Kumar, Ken and I are trying to say (along with a few others, I
believe) is that the flow, as described in section 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 of
chapter 10, works, and the only clarification (correction) that is
needed is the Tx_Getwave issue.
Adding any other flow is unnecessary and will add to more confusion.

It will also go against the main goal of the ATM committee as set by
you.

Regards,
Ambrish.

-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:23 PM
To: IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM teleconference

Kumar,

I heard this from you and Ken and others before, and I
have already responded to it more than once that making
a change of this nature is a "new feature" as far as the
specification is concerned, so I am simply not going
to entertain the idea, at least not with this BIRD and
this discussion.

Arpad
=========================================================

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ckumar [mailto:ckumar@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 8:59 PM
To: Muranyi, Arpad
Cc: IBIS-ATM
Subject: Re: [ibis-macro] Re: AMI_Flows_6.pdf for today's ATM
teleconference

Sigrity is of the view models employing getwave preferabley should be
using init only for parameter passing. This will greatly simplify the
flow,
minimize confusion  and more importantly will not potentially result in
the
problem of the same model yielding two different results.

A useful analogy is getwve vs init similar as silicon vs behavior
circuit
models
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

Other related posts: