Hi Mike,
Yes, assuming the EDA tool supports [C Comp Corner]. If it does not, the normal
spec interpretation is that none of the subparameters of [C Comp Corner] would
be used and the legacy subparameters under the [Model] keyword would be used.
Radek
From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike LaBonte
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 5:45 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Re: Recommendation on [C Comp Corner] clarification
Sorry I missed the ATM meeting today. Since "sub-parameter sets are the same"
might be understood different ways, is the intent similar to "If [C Comp
Corner] is present, any [Model] C_comp, or C_comp_* sub-parameters present
shall be ignored", or is it more complex than that?
Mike
From:
ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 3:57 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Recommendation on [C Comp Corner] clarification
Dear IBIS Editorial Group,
The ATM group decided today to make the recommendation to the Editorial Group
to change the following sentence:
* "If [C Comp Corner] is present, its value or values override any
other C_comp* representations."
to
* "If [C Comp Corner] is present, its value or values override all
[Model] C_comp, C_comp_* representations, regardless of whether the
sub-parameter sets are the same or not.."
(or something similar) to be included in the upcoming IBIS v6.1 specification
and decide whether this change can be handled without writing a BIRD or delay
the vote that is scheduled for September 11.
Thanks,
Arpad
==============================================================================