[ibis-editorial] Re: Recommendation on [C Comp Corner] clarification

  • From: Mike LaBonte <mlabonte@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 20:44:46 -0400 (EDT)

Sorry I missed the ATM meeting today. Since "sub-parameter sets are the
same" might be understood different ways, is the intent similar to "If [C
Comp Corner] is present, any [Model] C_comp, or C_comp_* sub-parameters
present shall be ignored", or is it more complex than that?



Mike



From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 3:57 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Recommendation on [C Comp Corner] clarification



Dear IBIS Editorial Group,



The ATM group decided today to make the recommendation to the Editorial
Group

to change the following sentence:



. "If [C Comp Corner] is present, its value or values override
any other C_comp* representations."

to

. "If [C Comp Corner] is present, its value or values override
all [Model] C_comp, C_comp_* representations, regardless of whether the
sub-parameter sets are the same or not.."



(or something similar) to be included in the upcoming IBIS v6.1
specification

and decide whether this change can be handled without writing a BIRD or
delay

the vote that is scheduled for September 11.



Thanks,



Arpad

==========================================================================
====

Other related posts: