[ibis-editorial] Re: [EXT] Re: specification typo?

  • From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "rrwolff@xxxxxxxxxx" <rrwolff@xxxxxxxxxx>, "bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "weston.beal@xxxxxxxxxxx" <weston.beal@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:43:04 +0000

Thanks for the update...

Arpad
========================

From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
On Behalf Of Randy Wolff
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 11:39 AM
To: Randy Wolff (rrwolff) <rrwolff@xxxxxxxxxx>; bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
weston.beal@xxxxxxxxxxx; ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Re: [EXT] Re: specification typo?

Editorial,

We confirmed in the Quality task group meeting that the reference should be to 
Figure 19.  I will add this to the IBIS 7.1 Known Issues document.

Randy

From: 
ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
 On Behalf Of Randy Wolff
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 5:33 PM
To: bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
weston.beal@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:weston.beal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-editorial] Re: [EXT] Re: specification typo?


CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL. Do not click links or open attachments unless you 
recognize the sender and were expecting this message.


Weston, Bob,

I agree we can discuss tomorrow.  It does look to me like that reference should 
be to Figure 19.

Thanks,
Randy

From: 
ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
 On Behalf Of Bob Ross
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 5:17 PM
To: weston.beal@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:weston.beal@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 
ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXT] [ibis-editorial] Re: specification typo?


CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL. Do not click links or open attachments unless you 
recognize the sender and were expecting this message.


Weston,

We can discuss this at the Tuesday IBIS Quality meeting.

Bob

From: 
ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Beal, Weston
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 2:47 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-editorial] specification typo?

All,

I'm looking at the IBIS 7.1 specification in the section describing [Composite 
Current]. On page 108, the penultimate paragraph references figure 18. The next 
page shows figure 19 with the figure that seems more appropriate to the 
description. I think that the text on page 108 should be changed from "figure 
18" to "figure 19." Does anybody have an explanation of why figure 18 might be 
the correct reference?

Regards,
Weston



Other related posts: