[ian-reeds-games] Re: Shaman as a Ritual master? Or...?
- From: michael Tholl <mrtholl@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ian-reeds-games@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:04:29 -0400
I would say it works better for a ritual caster. More in line with
what people think of when they think of shaman.
On 3/13/15, Monkey <murtagh69.monkeys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I could just rename the shaman if I change it. *shrug* I'm not sure if
> the title of shaman works better for a fire caster or a ritual
> performer, though, that's one reason I'm asking.
>
> On 3/13/15, michael Tholl <mrtholl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'd say it depends on what you envision.
>> If you'd like to have a shaman using spritiual/ritual magics, go for
>> it. You can still use the fire attacks for a goblin wizard.
>> on the otherhand, if you really want your shaman to use a staff and
>> have fire magic, the way it seems to already be set, you can always
>> make another unit using ritual magic if you're wanting that sort of
>> thing and it could be a witch doctor.
>>
>>
>> On 3/13/15, Monkey <murtagh69.monkeys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> So I'm making a few different types of goblins. I'm currently
>>> contemplating what to give the shaman, because I'm not sure if I
>>> should make it a unit that has ritual-based spells--sacrifice, using a
>>> sacrificial dagger that will have different effects, etc--or if I
>>> should make a separate unit for those and have the shaman use the
>>> firestaff and fire attacks that I already gave it.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Mew
> __________
> http://www.savethefrogs.com/
>
>
Other related posts:
