[ian-reeds-games] Re: Shaman as a Ritual master? Or...?
- From: Monkey <murtagh69.monkeys@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ian-reeds-games@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:54:28 -0600
I could just rename the shaman if I change it. *shrug* I'm not sure if
the title of shaman works better for a fire caster or a ritual
performer, though, that's one reason I'm asking.
On 3/13/15, michael Tholl <mrtholl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd say it depends on what you envision.
> If you'd like to have a shaman using spritiual/ritual magics, go for
> it. You can still use the fire attacks for a goblin wizard.
> on the otherhand, if you really want your shaman to use a staff and
> have fire magic, the way it seems to already be set, you can always
> make another unit using ritual magic if you're wanting that sort of
> thing and it could be a witch doctor.
>
>
> On 3/13/15, Monkey <murtagh69.monkeys@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So I'm making a few different types of goblins. I'm currently
>> contemplating what to give the shaman, because I'm not sure if I
>> should make it a unit that has ritual-based spells--sacrifice, using a
>> sacrificial dagger that will have different effects, etc--or if I
>> should make a separate unit for those and have the shaman use the
>> firestaff and fire attacks that I already gave it.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>
>
--
-Mew
__________
http://www.savethefrogs.com/
Other related posts:
