> > I would suggest you read the comments with the > > articles, I found installing=20 > > FreeBSD challenging. I regret I took it off the > > http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=3D5106 > >=20 FreeBSD used to have some real advantages over Linux, especially under heavy load and the TCP/IP stack performance. Matt Dillon did an excellent job with the FreeBSD VM. Where Linux would often thrash under extremely high loads and become unresponsive (to the point that you couldn't even log in), FreeBSD would just chug along slowly but surely. However, from about 2.4.18ish on, the Linux VM has really come into its own and works quite well. Also, the 2.4.x, the TCP/IP stack has improved significantly over the 2.2 series and provides some stiff competition for FreeBSD. Since the 2.6 kernel implements Rik's rmap VM code, it really flies even under heavy loads (Rik has conversed with Matt about VM performance). Several of the distro's backported this code to the 2.4 kernel (Suse, Redhat, Gentoo...), so many have already seen the benefits of it. I haven't seen any recent benchmarks, but I doubt FreeBSD has these same advantages over Linux that it used to have. FreeBSD is a great OS, and is still constantly improving just like Linux, but it doesn't have as large of a developer community as Linux and thus doesn't tend to progress as quickly. Steve ---- Husker Linux Users Group mailing list To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE