VIA INDUCTANCE II HIGH-SPEED DIGITAL DESIGN ? online newsletter ? Vol. 6 Issue 08 Greetings Everyone! Let me tell you about what's happening with my new Advanced High-Speed Signal Propagation class. After piloting the course at Oxford University last May, I have spent the summer refining the material in preparation for the U.S. premier in San Jose on October 27-28. As you probably know, I love doing live experiments during my seminars. This feature remains one of the more popular parts of the classroom experience. I like to show how things really work. Unfortunately, a classroom setting limits the length and complexity of the experiments I can do. To break free of that limitation I've begun filming new versions of the experimental demonstrations that I conduct in my High-Speed Digital Design class, as well as all-new experiments for the Advanced class. The first of these videos will be shown during the October classes, in lieu of live demonstrations. The filmed versions eliminate wasted movement between measurement setups, allowing me to pack more measurements into the same amount of time. The films proceed much like a TV cooking show?first I explain what I'm going to do, show the ingredients, and then we cut directly to the finished pudding. Spectacular video close-ups give the audience a much better viewing perspective that is possible in a live format. A professional movie crew, with full lights and sound, did the filming and editing. Initially, the videos will be shown only during my classes. I look forward to receiving feedback from those of you who have the opportunity to view them. The following question is directly related to one of my video experiments AND to the material covered in the Advanced class. ______________________________________________________ VIA INDUCTANCE II The following values for the inductance of an interplane via were collected using the incremental inductance technique described in chapter 5 of High- Speed Signal Propagation: Advanced Black Magic, ISBN 013084408X, and discussed in detail during my video "Inductance of Via", which will be shown as part of my new Advanced class. I hope you find the numbers useful. The setup is shown in , Fig. 5.33, p. 353, of High- Speed Signal Propagation (if you don't have the book, the figure also appears in newsletter Vol. 6 Issue 02, "Via Inductance"). The setup provides for four layers (signal, plane, plane, signal). The trace proceeds from layer 1, down through a signal via to layer 4, and then continues across the board. The planes are connected by a single interplane via, located some distance away from the signal via. The interplane connection is designed to be movable, so you can see the impact of its placement on the performance of the via. I can actually put my hand on the interplane connection and drag it back and forth while watching the TDR response getting better and worse--a fantastic way to optimize via geometry. The purpose of making these measurements was to corroborate real-world measurements of via inductance with a simple approximation: L[VIA] = [u/(2*pi)]*2*h*ln(s/r) Where LVIA is the inductance, in H, taking into account only that portion of the via inductance due to the traversal of the interplane space interior to the pcb, ln() is the natural logarithm, h is the interplane spacing (height), s is the separation between the signal via and one interplane connection, and r is the radius of the via. In metric mks units (h, s, and r in meters, L in Henries), the constant (u/(2*pi)) works out to 2E-07 H/m (assuming a non-magnetic dielectric). In English units, (h, s, and r in inches, L in nH) the constant (u/(2*pi)) equals 5.08 nH/in. The dimensions of the real-world via under study are: Via diameter 0.010 Via radius 0.005 Interplane separation 0.040 Conductor thickness (all) 0.0062 (~1/2 oz. Cu) Clearance hole diameter 0.024 Pad dia. on signal layer 0.024 (pads stripped on plane layers) Trace width 0.0075 Trace height 0.004 Trace length (on either side of via) 0.240 Dimension of planes (plan view) 0.480 x 0.240 The following results were obtained for the incremental inductance of the via. The data were taken using an HP 4271B digital four-terminal LCR meter operating at a frequency of 1 MHz. The results are listed as a function of the spacing S between the signal via and the interplane connection (measured center-to-center). The units for S are inches, the inductances are listed in nH, and the capacitances are in pF. All values listed here are corrected for the model scale and assume the real via is surrounded by FR-4 having an effective dielectric constant of 4.1 at 1 GHz. S L[VIA,PREDICTED] L[VIA,MEASURED] C[VIA,MEASURED] 1.7 0.49 0.46 0.40 2 0.56 0.54 0.38 3 0.73 0.76 0.37 6 1.00 1.07 0.37 9 1.17 1.25 0.37 12 1.29 1.41 0.37 Two known factors account for the deviation between predicted and measured results. First, the planes in this experiment (0.480 x 0.240) were only a few times larger than the interplane spacing (0.040), a factor which is known to affect (slightly) the measured results. This effect becomes more pronounced as the interplane connection is moved further from the signal via. Second, the simple approximation takes into account only that portion of the via inductance due to the traversal of the interplane space interior to the pcb, ignoring the inductance of the via stubs protruding above and below the planes. The via stubs in this case are much shorter than the interplane spacing. Additional errors result from mechanical imprecision of the model, and noise and parasitic effects in the measurement apparatus. The definition of L[VIA] is used in determining the reflection coefficient of a via (High-Speed Signal Propagation, chapter 5), and also appears as the term L2 in the overall inductance of a bypass capacitor (see "Parasitic Inductance of Bypass Capacitors", EDN July 20, 2000). Via inductance, via capacitance, trace loss, S- parameters, and a wealth of other topics related to high-speed digital operation above 1 GHz are all included in my all-new class, High-Speed Signal Propagation. See the synopsis at www.sigcon.com. ______________________________________________________ EXTRA FOR EXPERTS The stainless steel (type 304, non-magnetic) used in the model has a resistivity 40 times higher than copper. This feature enlarges the depth of penetration of current (skin depth) in the model, so that the ratio of skin depth to conductor thickness in my giant 100:1 model, when measured at 1 MHz, is comparable to a copper via, at a scale 100 times smaller, operated at a frequency of 250 MHz. The trace geometry was designed so that, if the model were stuffed with an FR-4 dielectric, the model trace characteristic impedance would be 50 ohms. So that I could get my hands on the model to actually move the interplance via to different positions between the planes, the dielectric I used in the model was nothing but thin air (mostly). To hold the model trace in position, and to separate the planes, I used small wooden dielectric supports. These supports are clearly visible in the video. The use of an air dielectric, while it affects the capacitance of the via, has no effect on its inductance. The characteristic impedance of the air- dielectric trace in the model works out to about 85 ohms. Best Regards, Dr. Howard Johnson ______________________________________________________ Join us for the US premier of my Advanced class in San Jose, CA: Advanced High-Speed Signal Propagation: Oct. 27-28 ...and for the popular High-Speed Digital Design: Oct. 23-24 We are currently reserving dates for private classes next spring. Contact Jennifer at 509.997.0505 or info03@xxxxxxxxxx if you'd like to book a class. A full schedule of cities and dates for public appearances is posted at: www.sigcon.com. If you have an idea that would make a good topic for a future newsletter, please send it to hsdd@xxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to this list send an email to hsdd-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field. To unsubscribe from this list send an email to hsdd-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field. Newsletter Archives: http://www.sigcon.com/ Copyright 2003, Signal Consulting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.