Hi Miika, thank you for your help.I finally see the HIP BEX! I also tried the HO using a single interface and between two different interfaces, and UPDATE messages where sent and received with no problem.
So, I guess the problem was not having the 4757 version... Thanks again! :-) Miika Komu escribió:
On 14/06/10 15:47, Nerea Toledo Gandarias wrote: Hi,seems like this was messed up in some recent commit. I could repeat the problem in receiving IPv6 packets and I fixed it in revision 4757.Hi again, sorry for my insistence but I don't know what is happening. I can't establish a HIP SA. I've got IPv6 connectivity. As you can see, I can ping6 between them: ping6 -i 3ffe::10 3ffe::1 PING 3ffe::1(3ffe::1) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 3ffe::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=7.81 ms 64 bytes from 3ffe::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.250 ms 64 bytes from 3ffe::1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.172 ms --- 3ffe::1 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 6004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.172/2.744/7.810/3.582 ms and I haven't got any HIP firewall crashed on the background (nor in the Initiator neither in the Responder) iptables -L -n Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination But, the Initiator sends the I1 packet and receives no response from the Responder: (INITIATOR): # hipconf get ha all Sending user message 22 to HIPD on socket 3 Sent 40 bytes Waiting to receive daemon info. 248 bytes received from HIP daemon HA is I1-SENT Shotgun mode is off. Local HIT: 2001:0016:bd4c:b878:b1b4:b27e:1ae0:d9d6 Peer HIT: 2001:0016:31cf:66ba:416d:95e4:ba33:90ae Local LSI: 126.96.36.199 Peer LSI: 188.8.131.52 Local IP: 3ffe:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0010 Local NAT traversal UDP port: 10500 Peer IP: 3ffe:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001 Peer NAT traversal UDP port: 10500 Peer hostname: (RESPONDER): # hipconf get ha all Sending user message 22 to HIPD on socket 3 Sent 40 bytes Waiting to receive daemon info. 40 bytes received from HIP daemon I'm using lucid lynx (10.04), just in case it is a problem related to the distro... Thanks, Nerea Miika Komu escribió:On 14/06/10 09:44, Miika Komu wrote: Hi, please also test that you have connectivity between the IPv6 addresses: ping6 -i <source ipv6 address> <destination ipv6 address>On 11/06/10 19:08, Nerea Toledo Gandarias wrote: Hi Nerea, just I wild guess but do you have a HIP firewall crashed on the background? sudo iptables -L -n If you see HIP firewall rules there, you can just run the following to start and stop hipfw gracefully (thus wiping iptables rules): hipfw -k <press ctrl+c>Hello Miika, Miika Komu escribió:On 06/10/2010 07:51 PM, Nerea Toledo Gandarias wrote: Hi,Hi Miika,I'm trying to download the 1.0.6-4712 release using the Bazaar but it gets stuck. Could you please tell me a way to get this release or thelatest stable release to work with the HO?the code is now hosted in launchpad. Get rid of the old code and try:bzr co lp:hipl Or are you actually trying to download the binaries? It's a bit unclear to me.This command functioned perfectly, so I think I've got HIP properly installed. Thanks.What I do to obtain the default configuration is killall hipd and I seeOn the other hand, I'm not able to establish the HIP association withthe 1.0.6 release, as the Responder does not answer to the I1 packet...I've been looking at the hipconf file and I see some options that I'mnot sure they should be working or commented, i.e. add map HIT IP (commented) or hit-to-ip on (not commented). So, I would really appreciate if you could facilitate me the hipconf file options, not only for establishing the association but also for carrying out the HO that worked for you ;-)You can always erase the /etc/hip/hipd_config file and restart hipd toget the default configuration file. Make sure that "shotgun" mode is turned off.that the hipconf file has only hit-to-ip map, nsupdate and nat plain-upd on.The most simple set up is to do this from the command line: 1. hipconf add map <PEER_HIT> <PEER_IP> 2. ping6 <PEER_HIT>By doing this, I get the following output in the INITIATOR: Sending HIP_I1 packet debug(hipd/output.c:1150@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): hip_send_raw(): local_addr: debug(hipd/output.c:1151@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): hip_send_raw(): peer_addr: debug(hipd/output.c:1152@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): Source port=0, destination debug(hipd/output.c:1153@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): dump:debug(lib/core/builder.c:1189@hip_dump_msg): --------------- MSG START--------- debug(lib/core/builder.c:1193@hip_dump_msg): Msg type : HIP_I1 (1) debug(lib/core/builder.c:1194@hip_dump_msg): Msg length: 40 debug(lib/core/builder.c:1195@hip_dump_msg): Msg err: 2212 debug(lib/core/builder.c:1196@hip_dump_msg): Msg controls: 0x0000 debug(lib/core/builder.c:1215@hip_dump_msg): ---------------- MSG END ---------- debug(hipd/output.c:1185@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): Using IPv6 raw socket debug(hipd/output.c:1191@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): local address given debug(hipd/output.c:1209@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): src6: 3ffe:0000:0000:0000:0 debug(hipd/output.c:1220@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): dst6: 3ffe:0000:0000:0000:0 debug(lib/tool/checksum.c:273@hip_checksum_packet): Checksumming 40 bytes of datdebug(hipd/output.c:1297@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): sent=40/40 ipv4=0debug(hipd/output.c:1298@hip_send_raw_from_one_src): Packet sent ok Put the RESPONDER I've got this: Receiving a message on raw HIP from IPv6/HIP socket (file descriptor: 9). debug(lib/core/message.c:542@hip_read_control_msg_all): hip_read_control_msg_all() invoked. debug(lib/core/builder.c:1849@hip_verify_network_header): Received a connection to HIT: 2001:001d:c174:1bf0:0cbb:a455:7376:9a0cdebug(lib/core/builder.c:1853@hip_verify_network_header): dst port is 0debug(lib/tool/checksum.c:273@hip_checksum_packet): Checksumming 40 bytes of data. debug(lib/core/message.c:640@hip_read_control_msg_all): src: 3ffe:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0010 debug(lib/core/message.c:643@hip_read_control_msg_all): dst: 3ffe:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001But it doesn't respond with the R1 packet. Thus, the INITIATOR keeps onretransmitting I1 messages to the RESPONDER with no success. When typing hipconf get ha all in the RESPONDER I get the following: Sending user message 22 to HIPD on socket 3 Sent 40 bytes Waiting to receive daemon info. 40 bytes received from HIP daemonSo, the HIP association is not established, as can be seen when typinghipconf get ha all in the INITIATOR: Sending user message 22 to HIPD on socket 3 Sent 40 bytes Waiting to receive daemon info. 248 bytes received from HIP daemon HA is UNASSOCIATEDThis is driving me mad, because I see that the I1 packet arrives to theResponder (as it gets the source address) but it does not answe with the R1 packet! I'd really appreciate your help. Thanks a lot.Thanks a lot! Nerea Miika Komu escribió:On 06/08/2010 08:17 PM, Nerea Toledo Gandarias wrote: Hi,I tried this with two interfaces and it is working for me. However, one of the interfaces is wireless and I'm running NetworkManager. Soperhaps I didn't repeat the problem with your exact configuration. There has been many changes in the code, including removal of a lot ofunmaintained research extensions and loads of code clean ups. Also,the new binaries are built for latest ubuntu/fedora versions and support for old ones are discontinued. The most important changes in the mobility code are related to triggering of the handovers, but this happened a while ago. By default, hipd triggers a handover when ICMPv6 replies inside the tunnel fail for some while. However, all handovers, including the ones occurring from handovers, are delayed for some seconds in order to wait for e.g. slow wireless interfaces to stabilize during WLAN authentication.I am running binary version 1.0.6-4712 (note that the last digit ofthe version number is derived directly from the version control revision). I'd suggest to try it out. Baris is back in the project and he might be able to help if the problem persists.Hi all,I have taken up again this issue, and I was wondering whether thisbug has been fixed in the latest versions. I have been testing the handover in version 1.0.5 and it seems that it is still unsolved. Thanks in advance, Nerea Varjonen Samu escribió:Nerea Toledo Gandarias wrote:Hello,I have installed the latest version of HIPL (1.0.4-5) running on ubuntu 8.10 on two vmware virtual machines. Both virtual machines have two ethernet interfaces configured, but eth0 is the only onethat it is up. That is, oops has eth0 3ffe::2/64 and crash has eth0 3ffe::1/64 configured. I am testing handover with SSH connection and a video streaming. Ihave installed the SSH server and the video server on oops, thatwill act as a responder, and access to it from crash, which is the initiator. I perfectly see the base exchange and the data transmision ciphrated using ESP. I have tested soft handover in two different ways: 1.- Introducing the following lines: oops: sudo ifconfig eth1 up oops: sudo ifconfig eth1 inet6 add 3ffe::3/64 oops: sudo ifconfig eth0 downHi, This is a known "problem". I changed it some time ago, but it messed up someones test environment so it was changed back. This is what happens in the code:Eth1 is upped and its address is added everything is fine and then eth0 is downed and its address is removed as a response to netlinkRTM_DELADDR. Now the code counts the addresses on the eth0 interface and notices that there is none and tries to 0-addr REAP. Notice the problem ;) Logically thinking what should happen:When an address is removed from the interface it should be checkedthat if it is the last address on the interface then look for other interfaces if there is something we can use.It is a simple fix, but as I said it was taken out because a testcase where there was an interface with Internet connectivity and one thatwas only used for nfs. In that case the behavior was not what thetester wanted it to be and the fix was reverted. We have one guy who is working on a rewrite of the code on theexperiences we have had with the mobility parts of the code. Thisproblem is on the list also :)2.- Using the script handover.sh (/hipl--main--2.6/test/demo/) In both cases, the connection drops, and you are no longer connected with the SSH server neither the video server. With the video streaming it happens the same, the video gets 'frozen'. The routes are well defined. I find I little bit strange having a script (handover.sh) to automate the handover process and have no results using it.The script uses one interface and its just for testing purposes. Not sure of its usefulness to others than me :D Hope this helped you... BR, SamuIs this possible? What am I doing wrong? Any help will be appreciated. Regards, Nerea