Robert Moskowitz wrote: Hi,
I recently started running hipdnsproxy as a service instead of from the command line in a terminal window. Further, I never really ran it on oqo2, which is the responder in my tests.I was still having issues with registering to my RVS at boot time from oqo2; it worked from the command line with hipconfig, but not via /etc/hip/hipd_config. Now in neither case do I supply the HIT for the RVS, oqo3, only the fqdn. So I decided to enable hipdnsproxy as a service at boot.BINGO! RVS registration at boot is now working!Today I started seeing something new. Maybe I just missed it since adding hipdnsproxy as a service at boot, or maybe it has to do with some recent updates to Centos (audit, giflib, xulrunner?).When I run 'host' I get the messages: ;; Warning: ID mismatch: expected ID 64739, got 51656 I get this twice. Or ;; Warning: ID mismatch: expected ID 27106, got 56991 Also twice.
http://hipl.infrahip.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=831 http://hipl.infrahip.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=838
Further 'host' only returns the HIT and LSI, not the ipv6 addr.
This is a feature of the dns proxy, not a bug :) Many modern applications (such as firefox) initiate connections to the server's IP addresses in parallel. So, at least the first connection is going to be a non-HIP connection even though it would be possible to use HIP. I am open for discussion on this topic.
And ping6 is not working. gftp does work, but is very slow. This is to a non-HIP host.
Is this the problem with ping6: http://hipl.infrahip.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=698You are trying to ping6 from HIP-enabled host to non-HIP enabled host? Are pinging using at HIT? I think it is guaranteed not to work. Please describe your test scenario better. Thanks.