[hipl-users] Re: RVS and ethereal patches
- From: Miika Komu <miika@xxxxxx>
- To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:59:55 +0200 (EET)
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Tomi Hautakoski wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Miika Komu wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Tomi Hautakoski wrote:
When using RVS(A: hipconf add service rvs, B: hipconf add rvs HIT_OF_A
IP_OF_A) and running patched ethereal-0.99.0 on A, this "unknown"
parameter shows up in I1,R1,I2 and R2:
http: //www.ee.oulu.fi/~thautako/ethereal1.png
Something is missing from the ethereal-patch?
I believe the registration parameters were just based on an older draft. I
fixed this, please replay and try the latest version.
I was testing this ethereal case but this came up when starting hipd on B
using todays hipl(182). Did I do something wrong because there was something
on the changelog about seg faulting getaddrinfo...
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:8B:D8:75:FA
inet6 addr: 4ffe::5/64 Scope:Global
inet6 addr: fe80::250:8bff:fed8:75fa/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:590209 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:362384 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:10238 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:256197729 (244.3 MiB) TX bytes:60577412 (57.7 MiB)
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:32810 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:32810 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:11041449 (10.5 MiB) TX bytes:11041449 (10.5 MiB)
..
Didn't happen with A but it has an IPv4 connection...
Workaround: ./configure --disable-opendht && make clean all
Samu, can you test and fix the OpenDHT code when it does not have an
Internet connection? I'd appreciate this.
--
Miika Komu http://www.iki.fi/miika/
Other related posts:
