[hipl-users] Re: HIPL - Mobility
- From: Andrei Gurtov <gurtov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:36:20 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Good job, thanks!
A.
DiegoB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> patch 72 in branch hipl--update--2.6 fixes the soft handovers. The same
> changes are already available in hipl--main--2.6 branch as Miika merged
> them there.
> The main reason why soft handovers were not working was, in a nutshell,
> that SPs/SAs were corrupted after the deletion of the address.
> The SA associated to the local address in the so-called stationary
> machine was also deleted and that caused the IPSec not to work as it
> should.
>
> Furthermore, the same patch helped to solve the multiple handovers.
> The solution adopted to make them work is to delete from the list the
> address instead of leaving it in PEER_ADDR_STATE_DEPRECATED state.
> This is needed, otherwise in a subsequent handover the echo_request is
> not triggered at all and therefore SA/SP were not correctly updated.
>
> There might be some possible fine tunings related to this, but at least
> this is a good starting point.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Diego
>
- --
Andrei Gurtov gurtov@xxxxxxx http://www.hiit.fi/andrei.gurtov
Adjunct Professor, TKK
PhD, Senior Research Scientist
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT)
High Tech Center, Helsinki, Finland
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGABuUP7jp0uceFkQRAnwZAKCpecdVv5o8UIUivBqjuKorZhAXcACff6OL
a7S4UAkSIJ1LynNDjtZkgFA=
=CSaL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
