[hashcash] hashcash for camram-spam list? (Re: [camram-spam] Re: Friday news)
- From: Adam Back <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hashcash@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:07:23 -0500
I notice this msg turned up days later, presumably because the
moderator had to approve it because I sent from a shell account with
mutt (so that it has 'From adam@xxxxxxx' but From: adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
This is an anti-spam measure; perhaps we could tweak the mail list
software so it allows posts with hashcash for the list address (such
as this one with a hashcash for camram-spam@xxxxxxxxxx).
This is one of the major things hashcash is for after all, and the
list is promoting use of the same ;-)
Adam
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:06:20PM -0500, Adam Back wrote:
> I notice in that article that it says CAMRAM requires 23 bit hashcash
> stamps. This is a stamp considered of sufficient value to add a user
> to a whitelist, right?
>
> I wonder if it would make sense to take the default 20 bit hashcash
> token as a once-off exemption from challenge-response / filtering
> false-positive, to improve hashcash interop story. (Once-off so that
> next time the hashcash user still needs to send a new token as no
> auto-whitelisting has occurred.)
>
> Adam
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:09:36AM -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> > http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/wo_johansson032604.asp
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: camram-spam-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: camram-spam-help@xxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
