[hashcash] Re: about bcc's (Re: hashcash doesn't pick the right resource during check?)
- From: Kyle Hasselbacher <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Adam Back <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 17:07:38 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 01:07:58AM -0500, Adam Back wrote:
>On Bcc's. Just tested this (Bcc's get no hashcash) and saw earlier
>your comment in the source about Bcc's and privacy.
>
>The "correct" thing to do IMO with Bcc's to respect privacy is deliver
>each Bcc recipient (separately) with it's X-Hashcash (and the other
>non-Bcc X-hashcashes).
I implemented this earlier today. As far as I can tell, it worked. The
new code is up at the usual place:
http://www.toehold.com/~kyle/hashcash/
The grep/undef problem is fixed too.
- --
Kyle Hasselbacher | Never test for an error condition
kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx | you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFATPy610sofiqUxIQRAnKdAKCFF8qZhNBhtm/C4yrNxQDI4e50LQCg9b7F
GJzheJL6knQDqhgwrG/zkRI=
=mXdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
