Jonathan Morton wrote:
(let's try this again because something failed on my end)
Actually, I received both of them. :)
like I said, something failed on my end ;-)
I think of proof of work stamps as in "introducer". If you want to talk to me, you must prove that you really want to talk to me.
Yes, that's a good way to describe it.
But after introduction, you want to be fairly sure you're still talking to the same person. I assume this is what you mean by "opportunistic signatures", and if so, it's what I have a suggested design for.
heh. camram implements lots of techniques...
I just went back and re-read your paper on it to refresh my memory. It seems that as of January, you had (effectively) PoW, weak whitelisting and a feedback mechanism implemented. Since then, you've added a content filter, and started talking about signatures and stronger whitelisting.
- Stamps versus pipe size (again, eric mentioned he had a spreadsheet with
some volume calcs. I'd really like to see that)
http://harvee.org/~esj/hcstampcalc.sxc should work
Pity I can't read it on my Mac.
well, I can try excel export. It's a very simple spreadsheet.
---eric
-- Speech recognition in use. It makes mistakes, I correct most