[openbeos] Re: why an alternative ld?
- From: "Bruno G. Albuquerque" <bga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:17:30 EST (-0300)
> I suppose the stock BeOS ld knows only about the
> libs that came with BeOS (libroot.so, libbe.so, libstdc++.r4.so)
> so a modified one would be needed to link obos objects with
> the obos libc.so. Correct? If so, then, where can I find this
> modified
> ld?
No, this has nothing to do with it. The proiblem is the BeOS ld was
including some weird symbols in the resulting object files and those
symbols prevented the kernel from working (as they were not available
when the files looked for them). This new version just fixes this bug.
-Bruno
--
Fortune Cookie Says:
"Thirty days hath Septober,
April, June, and no wonder.
all the rest have peanut butter
except my father who wears red suspenders."
Other related posts:
