"Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think we can all agree on adding the necessary rules to > > > Expander, > > > and leave the inclusion of the executable to the maker of the > > > distribution. > > Do we even have to add the rules to Expander itself? I thought > > these > > things were done by the user-defined expander rules in .../config/ > > etc. > > Like every good application, Expander should have some decent > defaults > when run without settings. Ideally, the settings file should be > created > only when your configuration deviates from the defaults. > Agreed, but the decent defaults might just as well live in the B_SYSTEM_ETC directory, for easier upgrades? Although, I guess that makes the binary dependant on external data which might not be what we want -- I'm not very involved in the details. -- Mikael Jansson http://mikael.jansson.be