Marcus Overhagen <marcusoverhagen@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > The FS shouldn't have to care about this. But the haiku vfs should be > made > smart enough to cache access time changes, and not flush them to disk > unless > there is another type of write access. I'm not sure I understand you: do you mean it should write out older changes first, and wait a bit until recent changes are written? Bye, Axel.