[openbeos] Re: resource.h, rlimit, rusage (fwd)

  • From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Open BeOS" <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 18:41:25 +0200 CEST

Hi Andrew,

I cannot send mail to you directly, since realbox blocks me. Feel free 
to contact them to reduce their overactive spam filter :-)
Anyway, I've posted your answer back to the list, since that makes at 
least a bit of sense.

------ Forwarded Message: ------
To: "Andrew Bachmann" <shatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [openbeos] Re: resource.h, rlimit, rusage
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:28:36 +0200 CEST

"Andrew Bachmann" <shatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As I am sure you've noticed I went ahead and changed this header 
> location.
> I don't really understand your proposal here though so I thought I 
> would let
> you go ahead and make these changes if you still think they are 
> appropriate.

That's only for the case if we intend to introduce new fields to 
getrusage() without breaking existing applications and making it 
extensible for future changes as well.
We can do it at any later time as well.


Other related posts:

  • » [openbeos] Re: resource.h, rlimit, rusage (fwd)