"François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Marcus Overhagen <marcusoverhagen@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Extensions and alias entries should probably stored in a hash > > > table, for fast access. > Doesn't the existing mime db already supports multiple extentions for > the same mime ? (by adding BMessages, but maybe it's not efficiently > parsed ?) Yes, it does. It still makes sense to have, for example, audio/x-mpeg and audio/mpeg point to the same actual MIME type, and maintain only a single set of extensions and further attributes. That would make the MIME system much more flexible and stronger at the same time. Bye, Axel.